Assignments
for Archaeology and the OT
Recommended
Methodology for Learning Experiences:
As
a way to assist you in getting the most out of the learning experiences
below, I suggest you do the following:
1)
Read the required textbook reading first. Make a sincere effort
at understanding the material in AOT especially – with particular attention
to material that relates to the questions.
2)
Read through the questions in the assignment.
3)
Check my website (under the appropriate class title) for any hints in regard
to the questions. "Hints" refers to the notations I sometimes include that,
in a sentence or two, give you the gist of the article and or the point
of the question(s) I have asked you to read in conjunction with the required
texts. If you do not have internet access, let me know right away so I
can provide a hard copy of any hints.
4)
Read the articles and complete the assignment.
Assignment
1: Read
AOT ch.1 and Currid's book in its entirety. Read the articles listed below.
In 4-7 pages, answer the following questions:
1)
In your own words, what is a "Tell"? In light of how tells are formed over
time, what are some basic presuppositions one might make about things that
would be unearthed in a tell?(see esp. Currid chs. 3,6)
2)
Briefly explain (in your own words) the "Reisner-Fisher" and "Wheeler-Kenyon"
methods of excavation. What are some unavoidable weaknesses in a method
that digs only trenches at a tell (as with Wheeler-Kenyon)? See esp. Currid,
ch.6.
3)
What does pottery and building-type tell us about ancient people and the
way they lived? (hint: what might the variety of containers and cooking
utensils in a modern family's kitchen or the type of house in which they
live tell us about that family?). See esp. Currid chs. 7-8).
Assignment
2:Read
AOT chs. 2 and 9, and POTW pp. 19-42 (Sumerians). Read as well the articles
listed below and answer the following questions in a total of 4-7 pages.
Evaluate
the ancient cuneiform parallels to the relevant early chapters of Genesis.
In what areas do they aid or obstruct biblical interpretation? What questions
do they generate and how would you address those questions?
Read
the following in connection with this question:
"What
the Babylonian Flood Stories Can and Cannot Teach us about the Genesis
Flood," by Tikva Frymer-Kensky, Biblical Archaeology Review4:4 (1978):32-41.
"The
Antediluvian Section of the Sumerian King List and Genesis 5," by John
Walton, Biblical Archaeologist 44 (1981):207-208.
Assignment
3: Read
AOT chs. 3-5, as well as the articles listed below and answer the following
questions in a total of 4-7 pages.
Tell
me what problems has the discipline of archaeology raised in connection
with the historicity of the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob) and the
biblical narratives about them?
Read
the following in connection with this question:
"The
Patriarchal Age: Myth or History? By Kenneth Kitchen, Biblical Archaeology
Review21:2 (1995):48-57, 88, 90, 92, 94-95.
“Finding
Historical Memories,” by Ronald Hendel Biblical Archaeology Review 21:4
(1995): 52-59 and 70-71 (his response to Kitchen above)
Assignment
4: Read
AOT chs. 6-8, and POTW251-292, as well as the articles listed below and
answer the following questions in a total of 6-10 pages:
1)
Explain the controversy involving Joseph's presence in Egypt and the connection
(or dis-connection) of the biblical account of his life in Egypt and the
Hyksos people of Egypt's Second Intermediate Period. What contribution
has archaeology made (if any) toward solving this issue?
2)
Read and evaluate the following article: Nahum Sarna, "Exploring Exodus:
The Oppression," Biblical Archaeologist 49 (1986):68-80.What
are the author's conclusions, how does he support them, and do they have
any impact on the biblical story of the oppression?
3)
Read the article by Robert Steiglitz, "Ancient Records and the Exodus
Plagues," Biblical Archaeology Review 13:6 (1987): 46-49.Judging
by the content, do you think it does an adequate job of "validating" the
biblical record of the plagues? What does the article demonstrate about
the limits of archaeology for faith?
4)
Read and evaluate the following article: Donald Redford, "The Monotheism
of the Heretic Pharaoh: Precursor of Mosaic Monotheism or Egyptian Anomaly?"
Biblical Archaeology Review 13:3 (1987): 16-32.What are the
author's conclusions, how does he support them, and do they have any impact
on the biblical story of Moses?
5)
Summarize the problems with retracing the route of the exodus and the traditional
location of Jebel Musa for Mount Sinai.Read the following in connection
with these questions:
Charles
Krahmalkov, "Exodus Itinerary Confirmed by Egyptian Evidence," Biblical
Archaeology Review 20:5(1994):54-62, 79
Michael
S. Heiser, "Mount Sinai in Arabia?A Reconsideration of Frank Moore Cross's
Proposal" (available on my website, msheiser.tripod.com/page1/
- if the site is not up and running by the time you get to this assignment,
notify me by email for a hard copy).
Assignment
5: Read
AOT ch. 10, and POTW 157-182 (Canaanites and Amorites), 293-316 (Ammonites),
317-334 (Moabites), and 335-348 (Edomites) and the articles below, answering
the following questions:
In
6-10 pages, explain the controversy over the dating of the exodus from
Egypt and the Israelite entrance into Canaan.How has archaeology contributed
to this debate (on either side)?
Read
the following in connection with this assignment in the order listed:
http://www.tinninroad.org/ministers/exodusdate.html
http://www.ldolphin.org/Jericho.shtml
Charles
Dyer, "The Date of the Exodus Reexamined," Bibliotheca Sacra 140:
559 (1983):225-243
Eugene
Merrill, "The Late Bronze/Early Iron Age Transition and the Emergence of
Israel," Bibliotheca Sacra 152:606 (1995):145-162.
Gerald
Mattingly, "The Exodus-Conquest and the Archaeology of Transjordan: New
Light on an Old Problem," Grace Theological Journal 4 (1983):245-262.
Bryant
Wood, "Did the Israelites Conquer Jericho?" Biblical Archaeology Review
16:2 (1990):44-58
Piotr
Bienkowski and Bryant Wood, "Battle over Jericho Heats Up," Biblical
Archaeology Review 16:5 (1990):45-49, 68-69 (this is Bienkowski's response
to Woods earlier article above, and Wood's rejoinder).
Assignment
6:
Part
I - Read
AOT chs. 11-12 and POTW 231-250 (Philistines) and the articles listed below.
In
2-3 pages, summarize the archaeological controversy (as it relates to the
Old Testament) concerning just when the Philistines entered Canaan. In
conjunction with this assignment, read Trude Dothan, "What We Know about
the Philistines," Biblical Archaeology Review 8:4 (1982):20-44.
Part
II -
The
view that the ark of the covenant is now in Ethiopia has recently been
popularized in a book by Graham Hancock entitled The Sign and the Seal:
The Search for the Lost Ark of the Covenant. Although Hancock's book
is helpful at points, it is given to much speculation and stilted handling
of the biblical evidence (not to mention antagonism toward the Old Testament
itself). For a review of Hancock's biases, see my article, "Moses as High
Priest and Sorcerer? A Response to Graham Hancock's Egyptian Explanation
for the Ark of the Covenant," available on my website.
Assignment
7: Read
AOT chs. 13-14 and POTW 127-156 (Hittites), 183-206 (Phoenicians), and
207-230 (Arameans).In a total of 6-10 pages, answer the following questions:
1)
Summarize the importance of the find at Tel Dan and the controversy surrounding
it. Evaluate the evidence for and against the authenticity of this fragmentary
reference to King David.
Read
the following articles (in this order) in conjunction with this assignment:
Hershel
Shanks, " 'David' Found at Dan," Biblical Archaeology Review20
:2
(1994):26-39
Philip
Davies, " 'House of David' Built on Sand: The Sins of the Biblical Maximizers,"
Biblical Archaeology Review 20:4 (1994):54-55
Anson
Rainey, "The 'House of David' and the House of the Deconstructionists,"
Biblical Archaeology Review 20:6 (1994): 47, 68, 70, 72
2)
Read the following articles and tell me where the author locates situates
the temple mount (and why), where he situates the original position of
the ark of the covenant (and why), and, lastly, why would his findings
be important to both believers and unbelieving Jews and Muslims?
Leen
Ritmeyer, "Locating the Original Temple Mount," Biblical Archaeology
Review 18:2 (1992):24-45, 64-65
Leen
Ritmeyer, "The Ark of the Covenant: Where it Stood in Solomon's Temple,"
Biblical Archaeology Review 22:1 (1996):46-55, 70-73
Assignment
8:Read
AOT chs. 15-16 and POTW pp. 77-106 (Assyrians), as well as the articles
listed below:
Read
the following articles and, in 4-7 pages, tell me (a) why would some believers
be troubled at the content of these articles (i.e., at the finds mentioned
in the articles); and (b) should such people be troubled? Why or why not?(c)How
could such finds be construed as being entirely consistent with the biblical
record?
Ze'ev
Meshel, "Did Yahweh have a Consort?" Biblical Archaeology Review 5:2
(1979):24-35
Glen
Taylor, "Was Yahweh Worshipped as the Sun?" Biblical Archaeology Review
20:3 (1994):52-61, 90-91
Ruth
Hestrin, "Understanding Asherah: Exploring Semitic Iconography," Biblical
Archaeology Review 17:5 (1991):50-59
Assignment
9:Read
AOT chs. 17-20 and POTW 43-76
(Babylonians) and 107-126 (Persians), as well as the articles below.Answer
the following questions in a total of 4-7 pages.
Why
is the mention of Belshazzar in Daniel viewed as problematic by some scholars?
How does archaeology assist in the treatment of this issue? Read Alan
Millard, "Daniel and Belshazzar in History," Biblical Archaeology Review
11:3 (1985):72-78 in conjunction with this part of the assignment.
"Archaeological
Backgrounds of the Exilic and Postexilic Era Part I: The Archaeological
Background of Daniel," Edwin M. Yamauchi, Bibliotheca Sacra 137:545
(1980):3-16
1.Summarize
the problems historians often have with the contents of the book of Daniel.
Summarize as well how evangelical scholars have responded to these problems.
"Archaeological
Backgrounds of the Exilic and Postexilic Era, Part 2: The Archaeological
Background of Esther," Edwin M. Yamauchi, Bibliotheca Sacra 137:546
(1980):99-117
2.Summarize
the problems historians often have with the contents of the book of Esther.
Summarize as well how evangelical scholars have responded to these problems.